Are There Signs of
the Second Coming of Christ?
[The interpretation of Matthew 24 has been a matter of debate for centuries. We encourage you to consider Jacksons views expressed below. Personally, this continues to be a matter of study for me and I dont have all of the answers. RH]
Church history is replete with examples of sensational prophets who have attracted public attention with the claim of knowing the time of the Lords return.
William Miller, founder of the Adventist movement, announced that Christ would come in 1843; when that prediction failed, a revision was made and 1844 was set. That prophecy also has proved to be somewhat short of the mark.
Joseph Smith, of Mormon fame, taught that Christ would come no later than 1891, but he missed it too.
C. T. Russell, founder of the Watchtower organization, declared that the Second Coming would occur in 1914.
One of the more recent prognosticators is Hal Lindsey, author of the popular book, The Late Great Planet Earth, who has argued that the signs of Matthew twenty-four indicate that Jesus will return to earth by about 1988.
Lindsey arrives at this conclusion by suggesting that the generation which witnessed the rebirth of Israel 1948 would also witness the Lords return. Since a generation is supposed to be about forty years, Lindsey surmises that Christ will return to effect the rapture (a notion without biblical support) by about 1988. He further concludes that since the rapture will be followed by a seven year tribulation period, Jesus will visibly appear by about 1995 to win the Battle of Armageddon and to thus commence his earthly millennial reign.
The alleged proof for the view that the Lord would return by 1995 or so was said to be found, as we mentioned above, in Matthew, chapter twenty-four.
As the Lord departed from Jerusalem (Matt. 24:1,2), his disciples called his attention to the temple buildings. The Lord then asked: Do you not see all of these things? Truly I say to you, there shall not be here one stone upon another, that shall not be thrown down. Obviously, the Savior spoke of that awesome destruction of Jerusalem, which would be accomplished some forty years later.
As they sat on the mount of Olives, the disciples asked the Lord when these things would be and what would be the sign of his coming and the end of the world. They likely assumed that the destruction of the temple and the end of the world would occur at the same time. Christ, in the discourse to follow, sought to correct their misconception.
The Olivet Sermon is divided into two major sections: first, Jesus dealt with the impending destruction of Jerusalem, and the signs that would herald that event (4-34); second, he spoke of his final return, and the lack of signs that would characterize that occasion (35ff) .
It is certainly a sad tragedy that hysterical speculators on Bible prophecy would take those signs that have to do solely with the destruction of ancient Jerusalem, and attempt to give them a modern application in the context of a nuclear Armageddon!
The signs which the Lord mentioned are found in Matthew 24:4-14. We will not take the time to discuss these in this article, but it is sufficient to say that every single one of them was fulfilled within the forty year span between the time of the Lords discourse and the destruction of Jerusalem in 70 A.D. Let us recommend three good sources of material in this connection:
J. Marcellus Kik, Matthew XXIV, Presbyterian & Reformed, 1948. Roy Deaver, Matthew 24 in Premillennialism True Or False?, Wendell Winkler, Ed. , 1978, pp. 105ff. Cecil May, Matthew 24, The Biblical Doctrine of Last Things, David Lipe, Ed. , 1984, pp. 115ff.
These are excellent study materials of this theme.
In the balance of this article I simply want to conclusively show that the signs of Matthew 24:4-14 could not find their fulfillment in the final return of Christ.
There are four strong arguments which show that the signs of Matthew 24:4ff relate to the destruction of Jerusalem in 70 A.D.
First, in that great verse which marks the continental divide of the chapter, Jesus plainly said: Verily I say unto you, this generation shall not pass away, till all these things be accomplished (34). The expression all these things refers to the signs that the Lord had given. And all these things the signs were to be accomplished before this generation passed away.
The question is what is the meaning of this generation? Dispensationalists are fond of saying that generation has reference to race, hence, it is merely an allusion to the Jewish race; and so, the Lord was indicating that these signs would be fulfilled while the Jewish race was being preserved (cf. The Scofield Reference Bible).
Such a view of generation, however, is at variance with the use of that word in the New Testament. In their Greek Lexicon, Arndt & Gingrich comment that genea [generation] refers basically to the sum total of those born at the same time, expanded to include all those living at a given time generation, contemporaries (p. 153). A survey of several passages in Matthews gospel will quickly confirm this (cf. 11:16; 12:39,41,42,45; 16:4; 17:17; 23:36). Clearly then, the signs of the Olivet lesson were confined to the first century.
Second, though Lindsey and others contend that the descriptions of Matthew 24 suggest a 20th century, international nuclear conflict. Contextual considerations reveal that the Lord clearly had reference to an ancient and local situation.
Consider the following factors:
(1) Christ plainly specified that the coming destruction would involve the ancient temple area [the holy place 24:15] and the city of Jerusalem (cf. Lk. 21:20).
(2) The disciples of Judea were warned to flee unto the mountains (16) instructions that would hardly seem valid in a time of atomic attack! However, according to the testimony of the historian Eusebius, Christians, prior to Jerusalems invasion, fled to Pella east of the Jordan River and so were spared the fate of the Jews.
(3) The Lord warned: Let him that is on the housetop not go down to take out the things that are in his house (17). Again, such instruction would scarcely make sense if the Savior had been speaking of a modern nuclear assault. But it made perfect sense in view of the fact that the houses of old Jerusalem were flat-roofed and adjacent to one another. Accordingly, Christians might proceed, via the road of roofs, to the edge of the city and escape (cf. Edersheim, Sketches of Jewish Social Life, p. 93).
(4) The admonition, Pray ye that your flight be not in the winter (20) anticipates primitive conditions when travel would be difficult, and:
(5) Pray ye that your flight be neither on the sabbath takes into account the fact that the gates of the ancient city would be closed on the sabbath (cf. Neh. 13:19) a fact, of course, which did not obtain after the destruction of the city.
Third, the illustrations introduced by Jesus to insure preparedness for his Second Coming preclude the possibility of signs being given to determine the time of that event.
In a number of vivid historical illustrations, the Lord declared that no time-indicators would be given to signal his Return; rather, the Judgment Day would catch men unawares.
(1) As the people of Noahs day continued business as normal until the day that the flood came, so shall be the coming of the Son of man (38,39).
(2) The people of ancient Sodom were unaware of the impending disaster until the day that Lot went out from Sodom, even so after the same manner shall it be in the day that the Son of man is revealed (Lk. 17:28-30).
(3) Christ declared that he would come at an unexpected time, even as a thief does. If the master of the house had known in what watch the thief was coming, he would have watched, and would not have suffered his house to be broken through. Therefore be ye also ready; for in an hour that ye think not the Son of man cometh (43,44; cf. 1 Thes. 5:2; 2 Pet. 3:10).
(4) The parable of the virgins in Matthew 25 surely teaches the lesson of constant preparation, for the bridegroom will come at the most unexpected time [the midnight hour a most surprising time for a wedding!].
There is nothing in Matthew 24 that lends support to the theory that Christ gave some signs that would herald the end of the world.
Fourth, one of the most persuasive points demonstrating that the Lord gave no signs by which the end of time could be calculated is the affirmation of verse 36. But of that day and hour knoweth no one, not even the angels of heaven, neither the Son, but the Father only.
The argument is devastating: though Jesus gave the signs of Matthew 24:4-14, not even he knew when the time of his Second Coming would occur. It must therefore be obvious to anyone (save those totally deceived) that the signs of Matthew 24 can in no way be employed to figure the time of the Lords Return!
Does it not seem odd that modern prophets can read Matthew 24 and predict the time of the end of the world; yet not even he who spoke the message was able to so decipher it?!
There are no signs concerning the time of the end of this age. Let us strive, therefore, to be always prepared for the Lords Return, or death, whichever comes first.